Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
events [2010/12/10 09:58] transactions [WTTM 2009] |
events [2010/12/10 10:02] (current) transactions |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| The Transaction Memory paradigm is argued to be as easy to use as coarse-grained locking, and nearly as efficient on multi-core systems as hand-crafted, fine-grained locking. It is thus not surprising to see a large body of work dedicated to implementing the paradigm and exploring its limitations. Very little work has however been devoted to explore its theoretical ramifications. The [[http://lpd.epfl.ch/gramoli/wttm2/html/index.html|1st Workshop on Theory of Transactional Memory]] is devoted to discussing those ramifications. It is organized on the 22nd of September, in conjunction with DISC 2009 (http://disc2009.gsyc.es/). | The Transaction Memory paradigm is argued to be as easy to use as coarse-grained locking, and nearly as efficient on multi-core systems as hand-crafted, fine-grained locking. It is thus not surprising to see a large body of work dedicated to implementing the paradigm and exploring its limitations. Very little work has however been devoted to explore its theoretical ramifications. The [[http://lpd.epfl.ch/gramoli/wttm2/html/index.html|1st Workshop on Theory of Transactional Memory]] is devoted to discussing those ramifications. It is organized on the 22nd of September, in conjunction with DISC 2009 (http://disc2009.gsyc.es/). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Related Publications ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ravi S., Gramoli V., Luchangco V. (2010) | ||
| + | Transactional Memory, linking Theory and Practice. | ||
| + | //ACM Sigact News 41(4):107-111.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gramoli, V. (2009) | ||
| + | [[http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/150432|What Theory for Transactional Memory?]] | ||
| + | //ACM Sigact News - Distributed Computing Column 40(4):79-81.// | ||
| + | |||
